In the early summer of 1998, my son Daniel and I met at the Kansas City
airport for a trip to Princeton, Missouri. Daniel wanted to visit the town
where his grandfather, Oren David Van Vacter, was born.
You will notice in this report the difference in the structure of the name
Van Vacter as opposed to Vanvacter. The story handed down concerning the
change in structure was brought about by daughters of Solomon Van Vacter. The
daughters convinced the family that the Van and the Vacter should be separate,
each "V" being capitalized. From that point on the name, in our family line,
has appeared as Van Vacter. Solomon was the older brother of Isaac by thirteen
years.
Princeton, Missouri is a small farm community in north central Missouri about
50 miles from the Iowa border. Like most small towns there is a town square
somewhat like a park with benches and well treed. Most of the people in
Princeton have lived there all their lives as did their parents, grandparents,
etc. The history of Princeton has been handed down from one generation to
another. Things that happened over 100 years ago are still talked about today.
As is the story of the family feud between Isaac Vanvacter and his
brother-in-law Grant Essig.
While Dan and I were going from point-to-point visiting old family cemeteries,
we stopped to ask a young farmer for directions. I told him my name and he
asked if I was a relative of Isaac. I told him, yes, he was my grandfather. He
said that the shooting of Grant Essig is still talked about today. He said it
goes to prove one thing; never take brass knuckles to a gun fight.
Grant Essig and Isaac Vanvacter were brother-in-laws, both married to sisters
of the Covey family. Some family members have said the Covey sisters were
always stirring up trouble in the family. Grant and Isaac could not meet
without exchanging harsh words. Finally on February 6, 1904, after Isaac had
purchased a new one horse drawn buggy (a light four wheel carriage), that was
parked outside a local business, Grant reportedly placed some feces on the
seat. Isaac decided he would have it out with Grant. He drove his buggy home,
unharnessed the horse, got his hand gun and rode his horse to town looking for
Grant.
Grant was found with a group of his friends off the town square. Isaac got off
his horse, walked into the crowd with gun in hand. Grant was wearing a pair of
brass knuckles and as soon as Isaac walked up, Grant hit him. Isaac did not
hesitate; he pulled the trigger, shooting Grant in the abdomen. Isaac calmly
walked back to his horse, mounted and started the horse walking in the
direction of his home. He increased the pace and by the time he was out of the
square and in the flats the horse was in a dead run. When he got home he
turned the horse loose in the fenced pasture, went in the house to tell his
wife, Minnie, what had happened and he took off running into the woods.
The local Sheriff and his deputy tracked Isaac to his home, but Isaac was
nowhere to be found. They tracked him into the woods for some distance. The
could tell by distance between foot prints on the soft earth that he was no
doubt running. The tracks led to a creek and from that point they were unable
to find which way he had gone. The temperature that night had dropped to near
zero. The ground was frozen and no tracks were found on either side of the
creek for several hundred yards from where the last track was found.
For five days he succeeded in eluding the law and its efforts to capture him.
Isaac eventually went to his brother Warren for help. Warren hired a local
attorney and the two of them went to Trenton, Missouri to consult with a law
firm there that handled homicides. The lawyers all agreed and advised Warren
that Isaac must immediately surrender himself to the law. That evening, on
February 10, 1904, Isaac surrendered to the sheriff from the home of his
brother Warren. It was reported that the surrender was quiet. No warrant was
served and no handcuffs were used. In fact, on the trip back to town, Isaac
actually held one of the sheriff's loaded shotguns.
During his flight, Isaac had frozen his feet. While in custody waiting trial
he had his left foot amputated at the instep to avoid the spread of gangrene
and blood poison. The possibility of recovery from the operation, and the fact
that the right foot may have to be amputated, was not good. They were not sure
he would survive to stand trial. However, after he was released on bond in May
1904, and returned home he began to recover at a quicker pace.
His trial was held in September 1904. The trial began on Monday morning
September 13, 1904. It was eight o'clock in the evening when the
prosecution completed its case. Court was adjourned until the following
morning, at which time the defense filed a demurrer to the evidence of the
State. (Demurrer: the formal mode of disputing the sufficiency in law of the
pleading of the other side.) The demurrer was promptly sustained by the court,
and ruled that the state had not made a case sufficient to warrant conviction.
Isaac was set free, but his health would never be the same. He was operated on
in St. Joseph, Missouri in late June of 1910, where he and his family had
recently been living. He was found to have cancer of the bowels and was sent
home to Princeton where he died on July 2, 1910.